Re: time for Autoconf 2.72 (was: On time64 and Large File Support)
Sam James <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Feb 2023 02:30:46 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 3 Feb 2023, at 07:43, Frederic Berat <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm also in favor of an RC release, I can then rebuild Fedora packages using the tarball from the tester list and do some kind of A/B testing. > Paul, would you be willing to try this? I don't think much work should be needed (famous last words) other than the tag & uploading it, given the target audience - that is, I wouldn't worry over testing it extensively given that's the point of the RC for now, and that can always be done before a subsequent RC or final release. Autoconf is currently one of the big barriers to making more progress on the C porting front, unfortunately and trying to explain to upstreams that some issues are ok-but-will-be-fixed-later ends up being confusing. If you're not able to look into an RC, I can try ship a snapshot in Gentoo which won't be generally available to users, but ask for eager users to test, but that won't help with other distros or interested parties. I'm happy to do the work if someone can tell me what needs doing, as well. I'm sorry to ask directly, it's just that it keeps coming up in discussions with upstreams & package maintainers. Best, sam
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 358 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iNUEARYKAH0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCY/wV118UgAAAAAAuAChp c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MAAKCRBzhAn1IN+R kFq4AP9AWSuEKv9ORKP7DbGPWE4skjUIJJynUbk3iY3Vt3yTSQD+IwKG6rLx0v+U XiI7r9NeETJ2v6AMmxd3VdpXvg3aVgk= =fx73 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----