Re: automated release building service
Tomas Volf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.general,gmane.comp.gnu.standards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ZgqwBCQH6dEuFbFJ@ws> |
I am not arguing for the building service, but: On 2024-04-01 14:40:20 +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > * Such an automated release building service is a piece of SaaSS. I can > hardly imagine how we at GNU tell people "SaaSS is as bad as, or worse > than, proprietary software" and at the same time advocate the use of > such a service. Would it still be SaaSS if the full source code to such a platform was published under GPL and the only "secret sauce" would be the signing key to certify that the archive in question was produced by the GNU's (FSF's?) instance of such a platform? Have a nice day, Tomas Volf -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEt4NJs4wUfTYpiGikL7/ufbZ/wakFAmYKsAQACgkQL7/ufbZ/ wamH5g/+KjSwoBheEsJ6ByZiWfYLexLwPPCOKiQbGPYcTnbYRNALMtzXlFVLb68g k4bQ1eplTp/oiUFHbibcyF21OnbIgNd7MSLOouAP/axqi0NBSaE07ZmGUnSlaupX KHM6x/vy7oXl5DvbaGa1FdJ0cyKswQoY4TPmn37FGLSSUCTh4HOtpwwp2C5y8YAO BvrbVf39s7mwisEoitHvDS3MK9EY+X/PqRnHFry4SuvqYTLB81xCeZn917s/0lhX CYzbXF1BxsVGu2Bq0pt2fCsDoBJHhXWMow3OIA33ymGBT3eiKLVUmENYiW17r/fb ZHzEMYOKxQTd+51oIX34IJ8uChv6+4MsF9q2Wo/iB4BXloXKuNHs97lY0omWWykE vvjWy0Iw4i6oxtDpAxr1382RMv2zdhHJmm1rLYQkYKM52ZgeQDzoYz6J3StLHU7U aNPonQaKmqUkqjXAYUmcxbBJmHg0gAurRaEpPcaJzDoGEcCgdi3lS+QsF/pIkGDK LZByNAj/4aTpYv8suCsxG01rFesloP0sA/KX57Gm3wkcl/8FmuqLv505ICNHfE7p GNzeZZaJLCO4nL1aTQpP0P7HE7HvFFxzC35iYy2rlfLpjlqr1C61E2u1eL0KTBys mci7CleeEPojwkf3kWqIsXAXTpSyrmr/L1Q9ouOIo9/fy/Ranb8= =cA06 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----