Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > What would be helpful is if `make dist' would guarantee to produce the same
  > tarball (bit-to-bit) each time it is run, assuming the tooling is the same
  > version.  Currently I believe that is not the case (at least due to timestamps)

Isn't this a description of "reproducible compilation"?
We want to make that standard, but progress is inevitably slow
because many packages need to be changed.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)