Re: [PATCH v3] new option: object-shortname
Thomas Martitz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.automake.patches |
|---|---|
| Organization | Rockbox |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 06.01.2017 um 16:33 schrieb Thomas Martitz: > Am 05.01.2017 um 15:31 schrieb Jim Meyering: >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> This option is intended to be used in conjunction with >>> subdir-objects and >>> Automake-time substitutions for included makefile fragments (%C%, %D%). >>> Enabling the option shortens the file name of object files such that >>> the >>> prefix >>> derived (after canonicalization) from the path is not included. >>> >>> Enabling the option is basically equivalent to setting foo_SHORTNAME = >>> foo. However, it also works flawlessly if a Makefile fragment is >>> conditionally included. Note that actually setting foo_SHORTNAME >>> still overrides the object name, regardless of this option. This can >>> improve >>> the modularity of Automake-using projects. >>> >>> Example: >>> without object-shortname >>> sub/Makefile.am: >>> bin_PROGRAMS += %D%/foo >>> %C%_foo_CFLAGS = $(AM_CFLAGS) -g >>> >>> results in objects: >>> sub/sub_foo-foo.o >>> >>> with object-shortname the object file name is: >>> sub/foo-foo.o >>> >>> And it allows the following in $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.am (not >>> possible with >>> foo_SHORTNAME=foo) >>> >>> if ENABLE_SUB >>> include sub/Makefile.am >>> endif >> >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Thanks for the addition. >> >> I've only spent a few minutes reading discussion about this patch and >> even less looking at the actual code, but so far, I have seen no >> addition to the test suite. I suggest you copy an existing test as a >> starting point, add something like the above in its Makefile.am >> section, and then ensure that the new artifacts appear in the >> generated Makefile.in. >> > > You are absolutely right. I added a test case. I hope this is alright? Hello Jim and other folks, This is a friendly reminder. I've added a test suite to the patch. Please review. Thank you and best regards, Thomas Martitz