Re: BackupPC and EPEL10
jbk <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Dec 2025 08:49:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.backuppc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/14/25 10:24 AM, jbk wrote: > On 12/2/25 5:03 PM, jbk wrote: >> >> I installed the six packages w/o issue in my RL10.1 vm. >> You should create the backuppc user first before doing >> the install. I didn't so wil have to mess around with >> that before I can configure it. >> -- >> Jim KR > I've now spent a week or so testing this build and all the > test backups of target client have succeeded and also some > select restores. I configured httpd with mod_perl which > reflects the production operation on my home system. > I would now like to build and install the > BackupPC-4.4.1rc1 release candidate starting with building > BackupPC_XS-0.63. These release candidates do not have pre > built src.rpm's or spec file thus when trying to build in > mock it is complaining of the lack of a spec file. Is it > possible to extract and modify the spec file for the > current BackupPC_XS-0.62 to reflect the .63 candidate. > I've already extracted it and browsed for what changes > need to be made. Obviously the change log is going to be > lacking in completeness. I would remove the references to > zlib being provided. > I don't want to use any other install method other than > as an rpm. > Your thoughts and guidance appreciated. > Well after browsing the epel source for backuppc-4.4.0-20 xs-0.62 I see I have a more complex task than I anticipated. There are a number of patches and added "sources" that tailor the user environment to a more predictable state. It appears that my approach will be to transpose sources within the src.rpm's and change named path's in the varios spec and folder names. I guess this is a good reason to work in a vm. Question: There is a patch by cbarrett in backuppc-4.4.0-20 that references issue #466 and is listed as closed around July 2022. This issue does not appear in the change log for backuppc-4.4.1rc1. Is this just an omission or does it still need to be applied as a patch for this release candidate. The other patches are outside backuppc scope and tailor the binaries to RH code base or pathing. -- Jim KR _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/