Re: Fresh install (ubuntu) permissions issues
<[email protected]> Mon, 25 May 2026 17:59:22 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.backuppc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============3632482166896638492== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tmDsRWFy1geSDWDY" Content-Disposition: inline --tmDsRWFy1geSDWDY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 04:36:19PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > On Sun, 24 May 2026, backuppc@sundquist... wrote: >=20 > > ... > > I reinstalled Apache2 and backuppc. > > ... >=20 > That was probably excessive. Did you see my private mail? >=20 > 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:59:25 +0100 (BST) > From: G.W. Haywood <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Fresh install (ubuntu) permissions issues >=20 > 8<---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 > > One commenter ... had SELinux running and had to write a policy > > ... I don't have SELinux running. >=20 > On Ubuntu I think it's more likely to be AppArmor than SELinux. >=20 > > ... One respondent provided some code to add to .../Storage/Text.pm > > to get more info on the error. I did this and got ... > > --- > > TextFileWrite: Failed to write /etc/backuppc/localhost.pl.new \ > > (errno =3D Read-only file system, uids =3D 33,113, gids =3D 33 33,33 33, > > umask =3D 027, ver =3D v5.40.1, prog =3D /usr/bin/perl) > > --- > > ... > > ... the read-only file system message, .. didn't make sense ... >=20 > Unless there really is a problem with the filesystem, which is quite > possible but seems to me unlikely, I wonder if that might just be a > misleading error message. Can you point me to the code that you used > to modify your Text.pm? I have seen that too: not AppArmor, not SELinux, but some "security" feature of systemd, mounting (bind-mount?) things like /etc read only: in that case, the error message /is/ actually correct. No systemd here, so I can't check. No idea either whether those mounts are "just" for services like the web server or more widespread. Cheers --=20 t --tmDsRWFy1geSDWDY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCahRx0wAKCRAFyCz1etHa RmAfAJ0VomZpnN3lezm+64lYcoBYwPyRewCfXvS0cALwCoCnSpfYj6oAyU8+j1Y= =PKvG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tmDsRWFy1geSDWDY-- --===============3632482166896638492== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============3632482166896638492== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list [email protected] List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: https://github.com/backuppc/backuppc/wiki Project: https://backuppc.github.io/backuppc/ --===============3632482166896638492==--