Re: [Bacula-users] Important Bacula Status Report -- second version

Kern Sibbald <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Apr 2015 18:28:30 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.announce
Message-ID <552E91AE.6020301__1852.70877923376$1429115488$gmane$org@sibbald.com>
--===============4095071452935467873==
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Ty=
pe">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
    <div class=3D"moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
      <br>
      Well, I cannot be so impolite and tell you that you are way off
      :-)<br>
      <br>
      However, please see below ...<br>
      <br>
      On 15.04.2015 15:23, Raymond Burns Jr. wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">1. I think this is good news. Not really sure.
        Sounds to me as work will continue as normal, with the possible
        assistance from another Bacula maintainer for binaries.</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes, this is, in my opinion, good news.=C2=A0 Nothing really changes
    significantly, except that I can deal directly with any copyright
    violations.=C2=A0 <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div>2. This is where I have questions.</div>
        <div>Assuming the FSFE was the legal protection during the
          Barios lawsuit, the final outcome was not 100% pleasant for
          the Bacula team. That is an assumption. </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    The assumption is not correct.=C2=A0 Though FSFE was the legal protec=
tion
    of the community version during the Bareos lawsuit, the lawsuit was
    between Bacula Systems and Bareos and did not directly involve the
    FSFE copyright. <br>
    <br>
    Bacula Systems (and the Bacula community team) is happy with the
    outcome.=C2=A0 I assume that Bareos is as well.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div>So this either means:</div>
        <div>a. Kern and team can protect Bacula community Code for much
          less cost.</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    There is no issue of cost.=C2=A0 It is more an issue of the situation
    having changed (e.g. I have many more resources to manage Bacula
    than previously) so dealing with copyright issues directly will be
    more efficient.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div>b. Kern and team can find protection that will render
          better results in a future lawsuit.</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    While the above is possible, it was not a significant motivation in
    the change regarding the FSFE.=C2=A0 In addition, I will be surprised=
 if
    there is a future lawsuit.=C2=A0 The other point here is that the cha=
nge
    concerns the FSFE and Kern personally, but not Bacula Systems. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div>c. The future will be unstable for community as the only
          viable protection is through Enterprise edition. (This idea
          doesn't coincide with a 7.2.0 release, but does allow
          community to remain free since 7.0.5 is so stable)</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    The above is definitely not true.=C2=A0 The future for the community =
is
    more development, more features.=C2=A0 I do not look at the change as
    providing more viable protection since it is not really a question
    of protection.=C2=A0 The question is who is the legal protector of
    Bacula, a big organization such as the FSFE, with many priorities
    probably more important than Bacula (my assumption) or is the legal
    protector someone who has spent 15 year working on Bacula and close
    to the project?=C2=A0 In 2006 my choice was the FSFE, because I was
    over-my-head with licenses and legal issues.=C2=A0 I do not regret th=
at
    choice, but in 2015, my choice is to rely on myself and those close
    to me who support Bacula.<br>
    <br>
    Thanks for your comments.=C2=A0 I hope my response provides the answe=
rs
    you want :-)<br>
    <br>
    Best regards,<br>
    Kern<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite=3D"mid:[email protected]=
l.com"
      type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Please tell me I'm way off, and "c." is DEFINITELY not
          correct.<br>
          <br>
          <div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 7:57 AM Kern
            Sibbald &lt;<a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
              href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt;
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br=
>
              <br>
              I would like to discuss the following topics:<br>
              <br>
              1. Bacula Release Status<br>
              <br>
              2. The FSFE and licenses<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              1. Bacula Release Status<br>
              As probably know, the latest release of Bacula is 7.0.5.=C2=
=A0
              This release<br>
              has proved quite stable but there are a few bugs open on
              it, and I am<br>
              working on them.=C2=A0 I am also working on back porting bu=
g
              fixes and new<br>
              features from the Bacula Enterprise version 8.2.0. I hope
              this work will<br>
              be complete sometime in June so that I can make a new
              release (7.2.0) in<br>
              June or July of this year.<br>
              <br>
              In addition, Bacula Systems has hired a new IT
              Administrator who will<br>
              begin in May. Part of his time will be devoted to
              improving the Bacula<br>
              community web site as well as providing binary packages
              for the<br>
              community. Providing binary packages for the community has
              been an on<br>
              going project of mine, which has been delayed due to lack
              of man-power.<br>
              By the way, the new IT Administrator has been working with
              Bacula for a<br>
              long time and is well known to the community.<br>
              <br>
              2. The FSFE and licenses<br>
              I would like to report that the FSFE has posted a
              notification of<br>
              changed relations between the FSFE and myself.=C2=A0 You ca=
n
              find the<br>
              statement at the following link:<br>
              <br>
              =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
                href=3D"http://fsfe.org/news/2015/news-20150414-01.en.htm=
l"
                target=3D"_blank">http://fsfe.org/news/2015/news-20150414=
-01.en.html</a><br>
              <br>
              As many of you know in 2006, I signed a Fiduciary License
              Agreement<br>
              (FLA) that gave the FSFE the exclusive copyright for the
              Bacula.org<br>
              software. That means that they had the responsibility to
              protect the<br>
              software. In 2006, I felt that the the Bacula project
              needed protection<br>
              and guidance of the FSFE and their FLA process, and I was
              pleased to<br>
              have their help. As the project has grown and become more
              global and<br>
              solid, I feel that I can more efficiently manage this
              responsibility<br>
              myself, and I thank the FSFE for their help over the
              years.<br>
              <br>
              The Bacula.org software that has been released, will
              always remain Free<br>
              Software, and it is not possible for anyone to change that
              fact.=C2=A0 I have<br>
              been writing and releasing free software and open source
              software since<br>
              1972, and as I have stated many times, I am and will
              remain a very<br>
              strong supporter and creator of open source software, and
              future<br>
              Bacula.org community software will always be open source.<b=
r>
              <br>
              My goal is to have the Bacula.org code covered by FLAs (or
              their<br>
              equivalent) that are clear and consistent.=C2=A0 In fact, d=
ue
              to significant<br>
              FLA updating work I did last year and early this year with
              lots of help<br>
              and understanding from the Bacula contributors (thank
              you), I believe<br>
              that all known issues are already resolved and I continue
              to work FSFE.<br>
              <br>
              If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to either
              post them to<br>
              the bacula-users list if they are general or directly to
              me at kern (at)<br>
              sibbald (dot) com if they are specific to you or you
              prefer to keep them<br>
              private.<br>
              <br>
              Best regards,<br>
              Kern<br>
              <br>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----<br>
              BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM
              EDT<br>
              Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2
              standard<br>
              Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM
              through live exercises<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
                href=3D"http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bp=
m-camp-virtual-"
                target=3D"_blank">http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it=
/events/bpm-camp-virtual-</a>
              event?utm_<br>
source=3DSourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&amp;utm_medium=3Demail&amp;utm_campa=
ign=3DVA_SF<br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              Bacula-users mailing list<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
                href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"
                target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a><=
br>
              <a moz-do-not-send=3D"true"
                href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacu=
la-users"
                target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis=
tinfo/bacula-users</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>


--===============4095071452935467873==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
--===============4095071452935467873==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Bacula-announce mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-announce

--===============4095071452935467873==--