Re: Bacula Release 11.0.0 (beta)
"Gary R. Schmidt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 16/12/2020 04:48, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 12/15/20 12:10 PM, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote: >> Hello, >> >>> >>> Compilation fails on Solaris 11.3 using Solaris Studio 12.6. >>> >> >> I would recommend to compile with GCC, it is free and available on all >> platforms. Of course, patches are welcome to support an other compiler. > > > Yes, I've tried that in the past and found it extremely difficult to get > correctly-linked 64-bit executables on Solaris using gcc. > On SPARC the Oracle Solaris Developer Studio Compilers generate much better code than GCC/G++[1]. We also prefer to use it - paying for licences and updates - and using a less effective compiler is not something we are happy about[2]. It's not difficult to write portable C/C++, but too many people these days think "portable" means "compiles on Ubuntu *and* Fedora Core", which is just saying an orange is an orange. Cheers, Gary B-) 1 - This used to be the other way around, but that was long ago when SUN machines were the primary development systems for such things. :-) 2 - Nor are our customers - but they aren't impacted by Bacula, that's about the software we develop. ;-)