Re: Keep a Pattern in Community Repository Names

Hello,

On 8/30/22 02:57, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
> Hello Eric
> 
> I know that you said that Debian repositories are not so simple and
> flexible like Red Hat yum, but without a clear and correct documentation is
> not friendly to install Bacula Community
> 
> I noticed that all documentation is wrong, is pointing for Bacula
> Enterprise repository instead Bacula Community, and I've tried the
> repository example link that you've sent me  but no succes to install
> 13.0.1 (Debian 11 bullseye)
> https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXXX/debs/13.0.1/dists/bullseye/main/binary-amd64/INSTALL

Thanks, I have fixed the INSTALL file

> I've tried this way "deb
> https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64/ bullseye
> main", it worked, but it looks apt-get update ignore something

No, it's more https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0 bullseye main

> root@debian:/usr/src# apt-get update
> Atingido:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security
> InRelease
> Atingido:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
> Atingido:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
> Atingido:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
> Ign:5 https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64
> bullseye InRelease
> Atingido:6 https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64
> bullseye Release
> Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto
> root@debian:/usr/src#
> 
> I do not understand how Debian repositories work, but I guess Bacula System
> has more knowledge to fix or improve this
> Would it be possible to fix the documentation for at least of the last 5
> versions?

I'm not planing to fix old releases for the moment, people should install
the latest version, but any help is welcome if you have patches.

Thanks,

Best Regards,
Eric