Re: Licence for bacula-doc 11.0.0 and later

Hello Carsten,

On 1/29/24 17:44, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I wanted to update the documentation package for Debian, but I noticed
> that the file LICENSE (which said the documentation is licensed under
> CC-BY-SA) went missing beginning with the 11.0.0 release of bacula-doc.
> 
> Right now the only file about licensing in the docs is in
> latex/license.tex:
> 
>> This manual and the associated code is the Enterprise version of
>> Bacula. It is not open source or licensed under the AGPLv3 as is
>> the Bacula community source code. Bacula Enterprise software is
>> proprietary.
> 
> I suppose that's an oversight, could you fix that?

Thanks for the notice, I will of course fix that.

Best Regards,
Eric