Re: Re: Numerical owners
Wiebe Cazemier <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:19:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/26/06 22:22, Denis Corbin wrote: > > Well, the argumentation you present here is just what I was missing > for. Intuitively, I was against doing UID/GID mapping to names (I had > to reject twice this type of feature request ; my argumentation was a > little weak for what I remember). > > But now this definitively makes sense to not do UID or GID mapping to > names. The most caracteristic situtation is when the /etc/password > file is part of the backup itslef, and the restoration is done in the > live system : two files of same owner could be restored as owner by > different users/group if the /etc/password file is restored between > them... I think restoring from a LiveCD is more common than restoring in a live system itself, but you're argument is also valid. I'm just glad we're in agreement anyway :) > > Thanks you for your feedback, Just helping improving/maintaining a critical piece of software on my system.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 258 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEJxNfMHkUjYo9d9ARAg2RAKCJnij3JXLFS27386AevrloCQcjnQCgrNDz jsMUf6BoNiyZC7oZHgaEdu0= =hYx9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----