Re: avoid warnings about slice vs. base name in single slice mode

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 31/07/2019 19:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,

Hi Matus,

> 
> is it possible to avoid warnings about "seems more to be a slice
> name than a base name."
> 
> when slice size is not defined?
> 

this warning shows anytime you provide a filename "archive.1.dar" when
a archive basename "archive" is expected. It is not linked to the
slicing scheme you want to use.

for example do not use:
	dar -l archive.1.dar
but rather use
	dar -l archive

may there be one or many slices (archive.1.dar, archive.2.dar,
archive.3.dar, ...), these are all part of the archive which basename
is "archive"


Cheers,
Denis


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=x4JA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----