Re: avoid warnings about slice vs. base name in single slice mode
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>On 31/07/2019 19:59, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> is it possible to avoid warnings about "seems more to be a slice >> name than a base name." >> >> when slice size is not defined? On 04.08.19 11:55, Denis Corbin wrote: >this warning shows anytime you provide a filename "archive.1.dar" when >a archive basename "archive" is expected. It is not linked to the >slicing scheme you want to use. >for example do not use: > dar -l archive.1.dar >but rather use > dar -l archive > >may there be one or many slices (archive.1.dar, archive.2.dar, >archive.3.dar, ...), these are all part of the archive which basename >is "archive" I understand this, but when using filename completion, full names are given. (I don't want to play with bash and its completion functions). What I meant was, if the warning could be avoided when no slicing scheme is used, which is I believe most common - so we could use full filenames and not care about slices and their extensions. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod