Re: configure fails for dar 2.6+ on Solaris

* On 5/25/20 1:10 PM, Blandon Ray wrote:
> I did run misc/init to generate the configure script, yes. And each time I
> pulled a completely clean tree. I was hoping to look carefully at what is
> different about the working 2.5 version but trying to compare them side by side
> did not produce anything instructive.

Since the configure script is auto-generated and will be different based on the
used toolchain, I guess we can't help without seeing it.

The line number is usually a pointer, but quite often for some reason doesn't
seem to match the actual fail location. That's another thing to take into account.

configure.ac has seen quite a bit of changes from 2.5.22 to 2.6.0. Can you
additionally make sure that the v2.6.0 tag fails in the same manner?



Mihai

_______________________________________________
Dar-support mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dar-support

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/
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=L5tE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----