Re: 2.7 pre-release: Virtual memory exploding and dar locks up
Carsten Aulbert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi On 30.03.21 21:48, Denis Corbin wrote: > pay attention to the fact tar uses a default compression ratio (usually > 6 depending on the compression binary) while dar use the maximum > available (9 or more depending on the algo used). You can tune that with > dar (not with tar AFAIK) thanks to the -z option (see details in man page). > yeah, for that reason my pipeline was actually storage box of origin: tar c | mbuffer --TCP--> powerful CPU box: mbuffer | xz -9 [...] | mbuffer --TCP--> storage box for tarballs: mbuffer | split --> local storage which in principle would still work except the new requirement of quasi random access to few files within the end results which tar would not allow, hence: *dar* :) > nothing at fault on your command, dar/libdar should tell it else, most > probably a bug I have not yet met in the non-regression tests currently > running... > > I will try to reproduce your context and see whether I also met this > problem so I can fix it. Thanks for feedback! If I can assist in any way, feel free to contact me on or off-list. If you cannot reproduce the issue I can try to organize access to a machine where I see this - but that would probably mean me going to the data center once again and single out a machine for you (some effort but doable). Cheers Carsten -- Dr. Carsten Aulbert, Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics, Callinstraße 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany, Phone +49 511 762 17185 _______________________________________________ Dar-support mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dar-support
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 5.1 KB) - not displayed