Re: error restoring Unix socket ... path too long to be stored properly

On 03/05/2021 23:08, imschmeg wrote:
> On Mon, 3 May 2021 21:48:50 +0200
> Denis Corbin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 03/05/2021 20:16, imschmeg wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 May 2021 19:35:58 +0200
>>> Denis Corbin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>   
>>
>> [...]
>>

[...]

> I am backing up user homedirs individually (each is the -R for its own
> dar run) vs. the system root, hence --backup-hook-include has nothing to
> do.  Also, the user is not logged in during the backup.
> 
> If I use --backup-hook-execute, isn't the overhead a shell spawn for
> every file?  Wouldn't that be more than the single find up front?

not for every file but for every home directory (according to the mask
used), but in your case as you a different backup for each home
directory, just forget about --backup-hook-execute.

> 
> I have done some timings, and the find -type s up front is surprisingly
> fast even for large dir trees, probably because the file system is on a
> SSD.
> 
>