Re: Recent writing about dar

Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jun 2023 00:33:02 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Wow! I'm impressed!

A such detailed synthesis on different tools! I can imagine the time and 
energy it took you, for having just done a benchmark with only dar, tar 
and rsync some years ago...  and this took me far more time than I 
expected initially!

Congrats!

Denis


On 23/06/2023 15:39, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not done with my series yet, but thought I'd mention some recent
> dar-related posts and such that I've made:
> 
> Recommendations for Tools for Backing Up and Archiving to Removable Media
> https://changelog.complete.org/archives/10500-recommendations-for-tools-for-backing-up-and-archiving-to-removable-media
> Discusses my project and how dar fits in.
> 
> Using dar for Data Archiving
> https://changelog.complete.org/archives/10527-using-dar-for-data-archiving
> The in-depth analysis of dar according to the guidelines in the first
> post
> 
> Mastodon thread about dar
> https://floss.social/@jgoerzen/110584716548088152
> I note the concept that dar is essentially a powerful filesystem differ
> and patcher, how it can provide an asynchronous rsync, etc.
> 
> Roundup of Data Backup and Archiving Tools
> https://www.complete.org/roundup-of-data-backup-and-archiving-tools/
> Looks at backuppc, bacula, borg, dar, and git-annex.  They are all tools
> I've used and have very different characteristics in some ways.
> 
> Still to come: concluding my blog series, and more depth on dar on my
> website.
> 
> - John
>
OpenPGP_signature (application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed