Re: Recent writing about dar
Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jun 2023 00:33:02 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wow! I'm impressed! A such detailed synthesis on different tools! I can imagine the time and energy it took you, for having just done a benchmark with only dar, tar and rsync some years ago... and this took me far more time than I expected initially! Congrats! Denis On 23/06/2023 15:39, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not done with my series yet, but thought I'd mention some recent > dar-related posts and such that I've made: > > Recommendations for Tools for Backing Up and Archiving to Removable Media > https://changelog.complete.org/archives/10500-recommendations-for-tools-for-backing-up-and-archiving-to-removable-media > Discusses my project and how dar fits in. > > Using dar for Data Archiving > https://changelog.complete.org/archives/10527-using-dar-for-data-archiving > The in-depth analysis of dar according to the guidelines in the first > post > > Mastodon thread about dar > https://floss.social/@jgoerzen/110584716548088152 > I note the concept that dar is essentially a powerful filesystem differ > and patcher, how it can provide an asynchronous rsync, etc. > > Roundup of Data Backup and Archiving Tools > https://www.complete.org/roundup-of-data-backup-and-archiving-tools/ > Looks at backuppc, bacula, borg, dar, and git-annex. They are all tools > I've used and have very different characteristics in some ways. > > Still to come: concluding my blog series, and more depth on dar on my > website. > > - John >
OpenPGP_signature
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed