Re: Recent writing about dar

On 28/06/2023 05:53, John Goerzen wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 26 2023, Denis Corbin wrote:
> 
>>

[...]

> 
> Interestingly, in one test case involving a detached catalog about 500K
> in size, doing it this way produced a catalog a few KB larger than the
> one produced via the piping method I originally documented.  Not an
> issue for me, but I thought it was a bit odd though.

is it the same compression algorithm and level used (if any)? Same 
encryption protocol used (if any)?

> 
> - John
> 

Cheers,
Denis