Re: Fwd: Bug#1050663: dar option --on-fly-isolate creates catalogue with broken slice_layout
Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:51:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30/08/2023 21:30, Denis Corbin wrote: > On 30/08/2023 21:03, Thomas wrote: >> Hi again! >> >> A quick update about my compiler runs today. >> > [...] >> >> All tests today are done with DAR 2.7.11 from git. >> >> Onflyisolation works/fails with these compiler/compileflags: >> >> export LDFLAGS=-g # does not matter. I'm skipping this in later tests. >> export CFLAGS=-g # does not matter. I'm skipping this in later tests. >> >> g++ 13.1.0 with export CXXFLAGS=-O ---> fails >> g++ 13.1.0 with export CXXFLAGS=-g ---> works >> >> g++ 12.3.0 with export CXX="g++-12" ---> fails >> g++ 12.3.0 with export CXX="g++-12" and export CXXFLAGS=-g ---> works >> >> g++ 11.4.0 with export CXX="g++-11" ---> fails >> g++ 11.4.0 with export CXX="g++-11" and export CXXFLAGS=-g ---> works >> >> g++ 10.4.0 with export CXX="g++-10" ---> works >> >> Summary >> ======= >> g++ 10 works fine with optimization. >> g++ 11 or newer work only without optimization. >> >> Hope this helps. > > Thanks for confirming this is a gcc issue. I don't know what should be > the next step, if someone fills a bug report to gcc Debian maintainer? What is weird is that there is no issue compiling dar using gcc-12.2.0 with default -O2 optimization under voidLinux distro. > >> >> Tom >> >> > > Cheers, > Denis >
OpenPGP_signature
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed