Re: dar_manager - incremental backups and removed file
Denis Corbin <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:56:58 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.dar.support |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15/04/2024 07:04, J. Roeleveld via Dar-support wrote: > Hi Denis, Hi Joost, > > I am replying to both in this single email. > sure [...] >> No warning showed. I just realize that dates are evaluated a the >> nanosecond accuracy, but the display has only the second as precision, >> thus this may be the reason of the warning while you see no difference. >> Unfortunately there is no way to get this information except restoring >> files. > > The backups I register into the database are taken at a daily interval and the > files are unlikely to be touched. thus, the removal date should not be the same as the creation date as 3 days passed in between... > [...] > > As you mention the directory: > $ dar_manager -B zdata_os_services_binhost_root.dmd -f usr/share/fonts/ > liberation-fonts > 1 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 saved > absent > 2 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 present > absent > 3 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 present > absent > 4 Mon Apr 8 08:13:39 2024 present > absent > > $ dar_manager -B zdata_os_services_binhost_root.dmd -f usr/share/fonts/ > liberation-fonts/.uuid > 1 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 saved > absent > 2 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 present > absent > 3 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 present > absent > 4 Thu Jun 3 15:32:10 2021 removed > absent > > The directory did get a new date, but the file has not been marked as changed > (if I read the output correctly) yes, you do. And this sounds really really weird! Though it does not explain the original problem with dar_manager, it looks like an unexpected behavior of dar, here, unless you make use of -< -> -= options? Which dar and dar_manager version are used? > > As this particular partition and system is not too critical, I can share the > catalogues and database with you directly? yes, you can, I'll have a look with the -x option just added to dar_manager (git / master branch) [...] >> what filesystem is used? Which option have been used to mount it? > > The filesystem: > # mount > /dev/xvda1 on / type ext4 (rw,noatime,discard,stripe=2) OK, the noatime does not explain the directory behavior it should not concern mtime (which dar/dar_manager look at) but only atime, and ext4 is not known to have any limitation regarding mtime behavior AFAIK. > > I have several systems using the same distribution, but only this particular > one is showing the problem. are they all using the same dar and dar_manager versions? > > -- > Joost > > Cheers, Denis
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEVeSEpqXFvH9T9/cuqLFBYNNrO6cFAmYdlJsFAwAAAAAACgkQqLFBYNNrO6fk qw//QHtZVZ2unuMvek2Kqv6b6ZBgbQ/WscVAA8rJgmFilU3gcxqTSukq9p3l5MAfEeoCtX8k2aTo Vf/pbFsWMdy9C7uQKWoDg/PVUKSH6SOlO+S0fcr7PjKmDLkHhRL9SQCfWHizGcsHxrToiMoTnvIe j5632U556GGfUA7DYk9M5uomz+c2LsDpHORQnuQAo7RJkpEYZn7pE3H3aTzmpsEJ/CRGQprhyRQv VfXd3gaKnBpc8p2Dz/GMathe2vMtO9DE3ojkn7jXVh7oqzqxTo/lY/b0ImC3k75kVH4zOtHE9EMV 8FSsIyhTnoyvIHNuqsSc9xBcQQZMX+bIREu/Gm/imYjA2o9hgkKO/mowARGpAOhCGS/OFalYF1ji btIRvJUSc6p6ef8WfDjUf0TyomEuBoN5EP5FCPJzvFPl7CSmOTJu3paybg5S22JNL0a1ZR6iKty8 FKEEZ7bZq/up+tieFT5GMf69mqZpTlMnW1CbQiDtSdGPgGLgVtmWtMX066XbYN0yG4VF5rdyR4jd uVvunH50gN4FoMFd2zZ+3oF4AnKo1S1LK51j62Edj22BhTk0Zc7FBweVKm099HDH5AQuYsQ1YcFT dnLxNO3hvXa7VvLXQcscXEns19qGNghpfLBW3l62wjjng3lDpw6+pVYNEl6sKOQbAfPiV3GRywi6 5A4= =rr1/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----