Re: Performance issues w/ S3
tink via Duplicity-talk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.duplicity.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAfwjx4hk8cO6b6XN-bq9uRAmiKLf2=yKP0G7U8q9SUj_hatfQ@mail.gmail.com> |
And without compression and encryption the local version takes 55 seconds. On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 09:16, tink <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 at 08:42, Thomas Laubrock via Duplicity-talk < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Tink, >> > Hi Thomas, > > >> Am 21.07.24 um 22:26 schrieb tink via Duplicity-talk: >> > --no-compression and --no-encryption >> >> try the switches above for the local backup. Maybe the problem is CPU >> bound and not I/O bound. >> > I'll give it a shot, but think that w/ the recent version of duplicity and > concurrency > I should get better performance. The machine has 16 cores (HT disabled), > 48GB RAM > and while duplicity was doing its thing w/ GPG only two cores were busy > ... > > > >> Also the timestamps from the log should give an indicator. >> >> But for me all looks like works as designed. I know, a horrible answer. >> > Fair enough, too ;) > > >> >> Bye >> >> Thomas > > Bis die Nächte ;) > Tink > -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? _______________________________________________ Duplicity-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/duplicity-talk