Re: Re: hdup2 issues

Let's "back up" a bit here. Would the python interface be *required*, or
would it be optional for those that want to use it? It would make much
more sense to me to have it as an option, so I can have my desktop users
run it that way if they want to but also have the CLI for servers that
don't have graphical interfaces.

Miek Gieben wrote:
> [On 03 May, @09:27, Sergey Matveychuk wrote in "Re: [hdup-user] Re: hdup2 issu ..."]
> 
>>Miek Gieben wrote:
>>
>>>- python based (it's really time for me to learn this :-) )
>>> all the benefits of a higher language (should even run on
>>> windows)
>>
>>Oh, Gosh! hdup is good for me now just because of small size. And I can 
>>move just one binary file from box to box. But to have python on every 
>>box I maintain?.. Never.
> 
> 
> Nothing is set in stone and I welcome all comments. This another
> thing, that wouldn't be much of an issue for me, but I can see that
> it matters for others.
> 
> --
> grtz,
>   - Miek
> 
> http://www.miek.nl                      http://www.nlnetlabs.nl
> PGP Key ID: 0xB18453A1
> fingerprint: 002B B079 0DDA 7D44 2B5C  CAB0 C3B7 F943 B184 53A1
>