Re: rdump
[email protected] Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:03:42 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.hdup.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1922340007== Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_27_12_03_42_2005_148)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_27_12_03_42_2005_148)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27 Dec 2005, Miek Gieben wrote: > *ai* :) rdump (I may rename it to rdup) also needs to hold the > filesnames in memory. But your code will be more efficient than 'tar' :-) see below > As most filesnames share a common prefix a lot > of memory could be saved. Currently this does not happen. If you want > to learn C, this is your chance :-) Right now, rdump is an extremely > simple and elegant program :-) > > btw, dare I ask how big your resulting tar file is? :) Not large, around 20 GB because we have many small files. The problem is 'tar': the file list is only 200 MB, but 'tar' needs 1 GB RAM for using it :-( Greetings Sven ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_27_12_03_42_2005_148)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDsR+OxztbDwtWmxMRAk0TAKCkkNDb+3l1cUcwKbgFbKpNwGquOwCeN13w MvJR1C6DW8fxEXudY/8fcmY= =zSZp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Dec_27_12_03_42_2005_148)---- --===============1922340007== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ hdup-user mailing list [email protected] http://atoom.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hdup-user --===============1922340007==--