Hello,
if you plan to make a script an official part of the project, please
have a look at https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/187
and the criteria highlighted for such a step.
KR, Eric
On 29/11/2019 18:16, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> I'm the main developer for rdiffweb <https://github.com/ikus060/rdiffweb>
> and Minarca <https://github.com/ikus060/minarca>, and more recently I'm
> getting involved in rdiff-backup development with small contributions.
> Through my software company, I'm already offering professional support for
> few customers for rdiffweb/Minarca and I do extends the support to
> rdiff-backup. If you contact me directly [email protected], we could
> further discuss how we can help you.
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:06 PM Brian Gupta <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> So I work with OP, and am trying to sort out our path forward.
>>
>> We have been using rdiff-backup for over 7 years, and we generally
>> keep backups indefinitely. A few years ago or so, we had to remove
>> certain PII data from our backups, for contractual reasons. The
>> ability to do these selective deletions is now an ongoing requirement.
>>
>> We contracted with rdiff-backup's primary maintainer at the time,
>> sol1, to add this functionality for us, and they offered to write it
>> as an open source contribution, as they said it was a very common
>> request. When they did this work for us, there was no indication that
>> it wouldn't be production ready. (We paid extra for a thorough
>> validation.)
>>
>> This is something I understand has now changed, as they are no longer
>> the primary maintainer and are disparaging the tool on a public
>> mailing list. [1] No bad blood here, we understand that open source is
>> hard, and companies' priorities change.
>>
>> At the end of the day, we need a file-based backup system, that is
>> relatively space efficient, supports remote network backups, supports
>> frequent backups, allows indefinite storage, and allows us to
>> completely purge directories.
>>
>> Ideally we don't want to change backup systems. Can rdiff-backup be
>> this system, with a little extra dev effort?
>>
>> If so, would anyone be willing to help us sort this out on a contract
>> basis? Need:
>> 1) fix current broken backup state
>> 2) fix existing delete tool, or write a new one. In either case tool
>> should be up to the standards of the rdiff-backup community, and
>> considered production ready.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian Gupta
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2019-11/msg00003.html
>>
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.