Re: Backward compatibility of next beta

Arrigo Marchiori <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.rdiff-backup.general
Message-ID <20200130104010.GA32977@nuvolo>
Hello,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:45:19PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Frank Crawford <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > (Sorry about the previous formatting I'm resending this formatted
> > correctly)
> >
> > Rigo,
> >
> > It depends on what you mean by compatible.
> >
> > Python3 version of rdiff-backup is not interoperable for remote
> > operations with python2 rdiff-backup, so v2.0.0 will not work with
> > v1.2.8 or v1.3.3.  This is a python3 vs python2 issue and could not be
> > fixed without major changes to both versions.
> 
> So just to be clear, the version of "rdiff-backup --server" must match
> the other version?  Right now I have a backup server that basically
> runs:
> 
> rdiff-backup <excludelist> hostname_backup::<dir> <targetdir>/hostname
> 
> Where "hostname_backup" is an SSH configuration, and it then uses SSH to
> connect to "hostname" where it creates and mounts an LVM snapshot and
> then runs "rdiff-backup --server --restrict-read-only /mnt/snap"
> 
> Having said all this, what you're saying is that once ANY of my target
> hosts get upgraded to a point where they can only run
> rdiff-backup-2.0.0, then I must upgrade ALL most hosts (and backup
> server) to be running rdiff-backup-2.0.0?
> 
> IMHO, that is a VERY VERY BAD THING.
> 
> > However, the backup archives that are created are compatible, so if you
> > did a backup with an older version, you can continue using it with no
> > issues.
> >
> > In fact, while this isn't in the planned distribution, there is some
> > comment by someone who has written a wrapper that invokes either a
> > python2 or python3 version, depending on what it is talking to.  Of
> > course the python2 version is either v1.2.8 or v1.3.3, not v2.0.0.
> 
> I think this is extremely important to get into the release in order to
> handle the use case stated above!  I certainly can't believe that I am
> the only person who uses rdiff-backup this way to back up remote
> machines.

Maybe you could find a solution by using the --remote-schema
parameter? If I understood correctly, it should allow you to keep two
versions of rdiff-backup side-by-side, rather than upgrading the
program at ``system-level''.

I cannot try this, but I would suggest:

 1- on the client _and_ server, install the new version in ~/rdiff-backup-2
 2- run the version 2 client with the parameter:
      --remote-schema 'ssh -C %s ~/rdiff-backup-2/rdiff-backup --server'
    
I hope this helps,
-- 
rigo

http://rigo.altervista.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.