Re: cross-platform backup tool Planning for milestone 2.4.0

Eric Zolf <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.rdiff-backup.general
Organization Rdiff-Backup.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 23/11/2022 13:04, Patrik Dufresne wrote:
> Hiu Eric,
> 
> Thanks alot for all the good work you have done so far on rdiff-backup. It
> was about time to have someone dedicated like you are to the project.
> 
> As for version 2.2.0 I have to re-test, but I've faced a compilation issue
> on MacOS with the latest pip version. I had to revert back to the previous
> version of pip. I'm not sure if it's related to pip or rdiff-backup at this
> point. https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/11597
> It might be related to the tweak we are doing in setup.py.

 From the look of it, it has nothing to do with rdiff-backup but more 
with the way Python/clang is compiling libraries and finding the 
librsync library and include files. I get a similar error message under 
Windows if I forget to define `LIBRSYNC_DIR`. I have no clue of MacOS 
but I'd check how it finds libraries/includes and what could have 
changed with pip in this regard.

> As for version 2.4.0, the list of enhancements is great and will be a good
> improvement to move forward.
> One BIG missing feature that is worth thinking about is to continue a
> backup after a failure.

Yeah, a bit too big for this release I thought. In my eyes rather a 3.0 
topic, once the code has been extensively cleaned-up. I'll keep an eye 
on it though.

KR, Eric

> 
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 1:57 AM Eric Zolf <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> milestone 2.2.0 is nearing its completion, and I've started to think
>> about what I'd like to implement for the next version.
>>
>> If you'd like to have a look, and give feedback, check
>> https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/milestone/3
>>
>> It's not a promise that everything will be implemented in 2.4 but that's
>> the things I plan to work on, and if they are too hard, then they'll be
>> moved to the next milestone.
>>
>> The background is the need to support the old 200 API aka rdiff-backup
>> v2.0.5. This hinders quite a lot my ability to do big changes, meaning
>> big changes will only happen for 3.0+ (which will be an interesting
>> release, but it's probably a few years until we're there).
>>
>> Hence small steps for now, also not bad...
>>
>> KR, Eric
>>
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.