Re: Version weirdness
EricZolf <[email protected]> Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:24:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.rdiff-backup.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, it might make sense to check what 'pip list' tells you, once called as root, once as normal user. Calling 'pip remove rdiff-backup' (without pressing y) would even tell you where the files are. Also, calling 'hash -r' makes sure that you're not using the wrong binary. KR. Eric On January 3, 2023 6:53:22 PM UTC, Alvin Starr via Any discussion of rdiff-backup <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2023-01-03 13:49, Robert Nichols wrote: >> On 1/3/23 11:44 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: >>> I have one rdiff-backup installation for which "rdiff-backup --version" reports "rdiff-backup 2.2.0" and another which reports "rdiff-backup 2.2.2". The problem: >>> >>> 1. On both systems, "rpm -q rdiff-backup" reports "rdiff-backup-2.2.2-1.el8.x86_64". >>> 2. On both systems, "rpm -V rdiff-backup" does not detect any changes in the installed files. >>> 3. The md5sum checksums for all of the files listed by "rpm -ql rdiff-backup" match between systems. >>> 4. Both systems are running Rocky Linux 8.7, fully updated. >>> >>> The system reporting "2.2.2" is a virtual machine. The one reporting "2.2.0" is a new installation running on the bare iron. >>> >>> If you have any idea about what might be happening, I'd like to hear about it. If you have no clue, welcome to the club. >> >> Ahh yes, I neglected to mention that on both systems "which rdiff-backup" reports "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup", and explicitly running "/usr/bin/rdiff-backup --version" reports the same as what I posted above. >> >Well if rdiff-backup --version responds with a result different from /usr/bin/rdiff-backup --version then there is another rdiff-backup installed somewhere. >Check your bash aliases. >