Re: Survey: compatibility vs speed of rdiff-backup development
EricZolf <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Feb 2023 11:39:35 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.rdiff-backup.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | rdiff-backup.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Yves, On 11/02/2023 21:43, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > "EricZolf" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> before I start for real with the development of version 2.4, I'd like >> to >> get your opinion on the exact direction to take: >> >> https://framaforms.org/compatibility-vs-speed-of-rdiff-backup-development-1676028206 > > Can you explain to those of us who are just normal users what things > like "Get rid of API 200 but keep API 201" mean, for someone who just > wants to use the program? I've updated the description to make it (hopefully) clearer. Basically, the only question is if you need (remote) compatibility with rdiff-backup v2.0 (API 200) and/or v2.2 (API 201), or if you don't need it and prefer to favorize speed of development. Keep the questions coming, Eric