Re: ERROR: Action test failed on step run
EricZolf <[email protected]> Sat, 30 Dec 2023 12:54:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.rdiff-backup.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | rdiff-backup.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
On 29/12/2023 16:36, C O'Donnell wrote:
> It is possible this issue was resolved in 2.2.6. The FreeBSD ports tree
> still references 2.2.5.
I strongly suspect that this is the case, this is why there is a
changelog, and it states for 2.2.6:
> * FIX: test action would fail with empty error message when using API
201
And I'm not a FreeBSD expert, but [1] references 2.2.6 as being the
latest version in FreeBSD Ports. Now, [2] states that 2.2.5 is the
version on the latest quarterly branch, whatever it means.
Hope this helps,
Eric
PS: please avoid replying to an old unrelated email/thread, it
completely breaks the threading!
[1] https://repology.org/project/rdiff-backup/versions
[2] https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/py-rdiff-backup
>
>
> On 12/29/2023 9:30 AM, C O'Donnell wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Eric and team, thank you for picking up the development of rdiff-backup.
>>
>> I am in the process of upgrading all of our servers to 2.2.5. My
>> backup strategy is remote source and local destination. OS is FreeBSD,
>> Python 3.9, rdiff-backup 2.2.5, on both sides of the connection.
>>
>> $ rdiff-backup test host::/
>> WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will
>> disappear, start using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
>> Testing server started by: b'ssh -C host rdiff-backup
>> --terminal-verbosity 3 --server'
>> - Server OK
>>
>>
>> As I understand it, the warning is coming from the server due to
>> '--server'. Setting the API version per the docs:
>>
>> $ rdiff-backup--api-version 201 test host::/
>> Testing server started by: b'ssh -C host rdiff-backup
>> --terminal-verbosity 3 server'
>> - Server tests failed due to ERROR: Action test failed on step run
>>
>>
>> Test fails. Am I incorrect in my understanding that 2.2.5 has API 201?
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Charles
>
>