Re: Linking the whole archive.

On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 11:34 -0700, Scott Bailey wrote:
> Ultimately, I want is to include item 1 inside item 2.  Iitems 3 and 4
> then depend only on item 2 and are smaller by losing the static
> linkage of item 1.  The alternative for me is to build all item 1 as a
> shared static; but I would prefer to have a single shared static. 

This text would be much easier to understand if you didn't confusingly
use the word "shared"... it wasn't until "shared static" that you don't
use the term "shared library" in its usual sense of a "DLL" on ELF
platforms :-/

> I am suggesting adding a tag to allow this, maybe call it
> "all-objects" or something. 

It should be something with "library" in its name, because of the
relation to <library> (e.g. <embed-library> or something)...

> Comments?

How are you going to handle the formats that don't support this?

Regards,
Vaclav

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com

_______________________________________________
Bakefile-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bakefile-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAknG0YEACgkQxDYa/UZSZMl7vwCbBLA5HhSSi3mPWZmy8jiOjBut
d0YAn0oohW/u4uimK/XeDpm4d6gz1fYp
=Yeie
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----