Re: smtpfront-qmail + cvm-vmailmgr error SOLVED!

Bruce Guenter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.bgware
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 01:22:25AM -0400, Dale Woolridge wrote:
> | This appears to be the right thing to do.  All clients attempt to send
> | at least one cred, even if there is none, so cvm modules need to always
> | parse one.  Applied.
> 
>     Oh no!  I didn't post an update.

Good thing I hadn't yet committed the patch.  I'm still trying to figure
out a workaround for the previous qmail patch that is breaking my test
environment (hint: I use a CDB to test, and rely on failures).

>     It looks like you already fixed
>     the problem in mailfront 0.93:  cvm-validate.c:cvm_validate_init()
>     now treats empty secrets as no secret, thereby making the cred
>     count correct when the cvm module uses an empty CVM_LOOKUP_SECRET.

Yes.

>     Does that mean all cvm clients should behave as mailfront 0.93 does?

Probably, on lookup mode at least.

>     Are there other clients that use lookup mode?

Not that I am aware of.
-- 
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ http://untroubled.org/
OpenPGP key: 699980E8 / D0B7 C8DD 365D A395 29DA  2E2A E96F B2DC 6999 80E8
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCebJD6W+y3GmZgOgRAuIuAKCMQj3NzIzOef6KSEK0hJ3TEN3S3ACeIbD5
Pv9UEdVfbD2oA84p5aeimH4=
=0k2l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.