Re: patches for mailfront
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:37:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.bgware |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:31:27PM -0400, Dale Woolridge wrote: > The second adds an 'a' rule for authenticated clients. This rule acts the > same as a 'd' rule (but the default message is "Authenticate first") unless > the remote client has authenticated, in which case it acts like a 'p' rule. Ideally it should be possible to add extra conditions to each rule, such as authenticated vs non-authenticated. I don't see any easy way of grafting that on, though. The problem with this is that 'a' lines work only one way (what if a 'z' was desired?). > I thought about doing this differently by creating an ':authenticated' > selector line. Thoughts/comments on this? The problem with a single selector is that it throws away the sender vs recipient selector for the following lines. What would probably work better is to allow either multiple selectors on a single line (ie ":authenticated:sender"), or have :authenticated (and a correspodning :unauthenticated) work independantly of :sender vs :recipient. Which makes more sense to you?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCzsfW6W+y3GmZgOgRAjiWAJ9j5wSX8BG6y1ih5ZfI7k/+TT3XnwCeOZNg fATEJqkf1eVryScfgzBwZLc= =pNWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----