Re: [PATCH] remote_expect: Pass "break" and "continue" exceptions up

Hi Maciej

Thanks for the thorough explanation of the problem.

>  My proposal therefore is to simplify the return path from
> remote_expect and except from keeping the current special handling
> of the error exception intact, pass all the other conditions expect
> might have produced up to the caller.  Below is the proposed
> implementation.  It makes a loop like above behave as expected.

I agree that remote_expect should behave as similar to expect as
possible to adhere to the principle of least surprise.  I will apply
your patch now, thanks.

Cheers, Ben