Re: Leaked fd into spawned children
Ben Elliston <[email protected]> Sat, 31 Aug 2013 15:45:52 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jan > echo 'remote_exec target "ls -l /proc/self/fd/"' >dejagnuleak.exp > runtest dejagnuleak.exp > cat testrun.log Thanks, reproduced. > Actual results: > lrwx------ 1 jkratoch jkratoch 64 Aug 26 21:15 0 -> /dev/pts/5 > lrwx------ 1 jkratoch jkratoch 64 Aug 26 21:15 1 -> /dev/pts/5 > lrwx------ 1 jkratoch jkratoch 64 Aug 26 21:15 2 -> /dev/pts/5 > lrwx------ 1 jkratoch jkratoch 64 Aug 26 21:15 3 -> /dev/pts/2 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > lr-x------ 1 jkratoch jkratoch 64 Aug 26 21:15 4 -> /proc/25522/fd Do you know what fd 3 is, in this case? I've tried a few things with Expect and a Dejagnu .exp script that doesn't use remote_exec and can't reproduce it there. Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ Bug-dejagnu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-dejagnu
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 828 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUiGDD+ZqTimv57y9AQiEhA/+JKZob9+3V0c/8wEZ/J6UfW7UysD7nrMZ /dpMSYejTMiFX900p7DUsUBSbV1LYGjdvS/lJ4AaVg6WIekGxhz7kW7V7vd32hN2 mJIDqPijKf+PXewjYrHFcSFWjh58ZOQ2oHFXKFuF4FPXiZJfMC8UEaBMmhOOS5AP viiTGGxS5EFnub7/H65sQvleF12I4J582Y2x5/kKRRDzL8ADfH9hYw2ZdvNroVrG JeNjP07JLIlIKXN9W9adZGouuOQXEWQxNs447elXMvpr2QGrOXRYMveUutHWIC96 4VhnwjFhiKJJDVyzQBh5Bp4cmsHcKiLvv/Ee23a4nRkzIzicUjrC2vU3K6pnuxvc hqTKqu610/sqJ6/SRIX8UM2159Zfm0zM1ILOT0VQqFGMgN1FvjXGez+DBrQg2cYJ aED9bTAtUiVBwW2d5f1FajTWo/Nu6XBhLUOnpODrpDIc/jwOwI9mgGKvMr/QR7TY mMVGV89nS0Eq7jcdBfvNp02Bm+deToHCO5dEItXBg2lZtpcuMi9bF96wCiNloiHe ns5ohFt1jIMprK3KJsotWBFCXVqNJdSD4lEaUo4wKWK2ra3Y0vZoYy5M1H4SryU3 cD3U2DWTc8r4n1fVy05E3Mc3w8Qam2it14F2J8qpCcIKaf3Lbt1uHgHUmfm2w2fA VJKAWABhuqU= =S95i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----