bug#41824: Dejagnu's unknown proc aborts testsuite run when triggered in test-case
Pedro Alves <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jun 2020 12:40:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/26/20 11:58 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: >> The issue for me is that the "gdb Summary" tally did not >> mention the aborted testcase. I would like to see something >> like this instead: >> >> # of expected passes 208 >> # of nasty OMG FIX! tcl errors 1 >> >> :-) >> >> Your UNRESOLVED is of course better than the status quo. >> > > UNRESOLVED is a step in the right direction, but I agree that more is needed. We are somewhat limited by POSIX, which does not define a separate result type for "test case crashed" and seems to roll that into UNRESOLVED, although POSIX appears to require a testsuite to have a strictly-defined set of tests and that a run must produce results for exactly all of them, which requires information DejaGnu does not normally have about the running testsuite. So, while UNRESOLVED is needed, we could also maintain a separate count of UNRESOLVED-due-to-crash, or simply store away the error message/errorCode/errorInfo tuples and emit them a second time at the end of the run, also easy in Tcl 8. I'm not sure how much is POSIX compliance important these days. I would hope that that would not limit DejaGnu's development and limit its potential to be more usable. Even if POSIX compliance is important, I would think that that could be put behind a --posixly_correct option, and/or POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable, like other GNU tools do: https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Non_002dGNU-Standards.html Or conversely, we could have a --gnu mode, though I would say that a GNU tool should behave in GNU mode by default. I really don't buy that adding different result types is an issue, as hinted earlier. We've actually done it in GDB, for a loooong while. We have distinct XFAIL vs KFAIL output messages show up in the .sum file (though those aren't distinguished in the summary file, doing so would be convenient, hence I see that as a GDB testsuite bug). And just very recently, we've added PATH and DUPLICATE output messages, and those do show up in the summary: # of expected passes 89593 # of unexpected failures 547 # of expected failures 146 # of known failures 104 # of untested testcases 20 # of unresolved testcases 5 # of unsupported tests 97 # of paths in test names 1 <<<<< # of duplicate test names 370 <<<<< I would think that even these two would be useful to have in DejaGnu proper for all testsuites. v1/rationale - https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167847.html v3/final version - https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/168105.html Thanks, Pedro Alves _______________________________________________ Bug-dejagnu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-dejagnu