Re: [PATCH 0/1] New option for runtest to log_user to stdout

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:04:09PM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:

> So, I'm proposing adding a new option (--log_user is my suggestion,
> but feel free to pick something else) to allow enabling "log_user"
> expect output to stdout without the need to increase verbosity.

I don't have a problem with the patch in priciple.  I can see it would
be useful, and it's optional.  However, calling the option 'log_user'
exposes details of Expect.  I would rather not do that.  Can you
rename the option to perhaps --log_dialog?  Better to keep the
underscore for consistency with older, existing two-word options (eg,
--tool_opts).

Can you please update the patch and send it again?

Thanks, Ben

_______________________________________________
DejaGnu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=bZn8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----