Re: Rethinking remote testing
Ben Elliston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:19:39PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > The recent and ongoing discussion over is_remote (and why is that > the only is* predicate with an underscore in the name?) and its > less-than-entirely-accurate implementation started me thinking about > the topic. What would be a better way to handle remote testing? I wondered about that, too. I will add an isremote proc that wraps is_remote. We can then try and depreciate is_remote over the long-term. Cheers, Ben _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEFS8+rdM1/2KWERKFZ9rcPj90NkkFAlwAiPUACgkQZ9rcPj90 Nkmj+w/+KQXm8Gdap/422Dhf6ZPtjV1XBlgGLNDdezO8hUhUOZ+mQgYme1fVdBWp TfUIWkZcB4vwDBOeKZvcgpl4N8Qh0RfwSP4TQ7KfZm5AYC4x/zQ3F5zQhFZh9stb HMTAPK2kU0SJRM5Mn/Xaff9NbN9xHRgBEcCc6/eXRXWYZzFM/md9gpVMo/2E/t7K j5E+kbLQlTt5Oez3Fyp02vLw5QWDgnVgd94nLWBYilvSvu/UNTgvP5f6DExHat/1 lAJ0pj9nohkZfp18vaVUr07PHcwlX761woM2huHrIMWXqxUFY24nY+H0Na/hagCf oob9bzl7GbwAkI2APnmwI7w1jDNQOI3SPTKDVMxL3qo+068VNryaJKhn1Q67OTES 5V2ZbSlpOfzlPilFHTx+M711bzVHa7dEc8RDa9piy+kBGzRMkNXp7olWmsz3ityL LCQX4kdTvuUCRUEM3LVu8CXsZixaA+IEjHpRmlN8l0Gn8NWp4waaIgsgEtnx/k0I 55OoANEpcX5RWIY0Bz/iAYZE2rmQSWKYMDwywY5ENm4PQnX79zs3EUzzlC/oFT/x re6ygZ/IxEOwFgile4UAfe8Jp0Y+fsNF9QLpM8NeLRXz7WwLICFPp/rJEBEB0KOr Vedr5B1wBIYROCdVNRVS5EUNhiUkQqB+bFGZL1aZAygu7/9cmFI= =yBWr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----