Re: PATCH: remove redundant methods in dejagnu.h

Ben Elliston wrote:
> I spotted this while reading dejagnu.h. There is no need to provide
> additional methods that peform the same runtime type conversion that
> C++ does for us.  OK to commit?
>   

What revision of C++ added those runtime type conversions?  Is it 
plausible that any projects out there might be using an older C++ 
version?  Could there be a compiler out there that does not do those 
conversions on function calls even though it should?

What, if any, harm does having these unneeded functions do?


-- Jacob