Re: PATCH: simplify regular expressions
Rob Savoye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Seneca Software & Solar, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/11/18 2:55 AM, Ben Elliston wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:30:49PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote: > >> GDB has changed somewhat over the years; are the strings those >> modules seek still valid or do we need to accept both "old" and >> "new" message sets? Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI >> mode, possibly in another module? There are already some MI test cases in GDB. > I think DejaGnu needs to be able to still test quite old versions. > > Using GDB MI from within DejaGnu is a really interesting idea. How > stable has the MI interface been in practice? Tom would know more, but at the last Cauldron I attended, several of us had a long talk about this. MI doesn't cover the full range of what a user can do with GDB. An MI testsuite would be good, but we'd still need all the current GDB tests. - rob - _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQYk2vt9P4wiD5DJs5QuaEQoLbT/gUCXA/QNwAKCRBQuaEQoLbT /jGcAKCMDhI28WA2jx2X2uKcApTZQUYkogCcC7j4GBh8ffrAymupbjmdkrczXZQ= =lrhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----