Re: PATCH: simplify regular expressions

Rob Savoye <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.general
Organization Seneca Software & Solar, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/11/18 2:55 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:30:49PM -0600, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> 
>> GDB has changed somewhat over the years; are the strings those
>> modules seek still valid or do we need to accept both "old" and
>> "new" message sets?  Should DejaGnu eventually support GDB's MI
>> mode, possibly in another module?

 There are already some MI test cases in GDB.

> I think DejaGnu needs to be able to still test quite old versions.
> 
> Using GDB MI from within DejaGnu is a really interesting idea. How
> stable has the MI interface been in practice?

  Tom would know more, but at the last Cauldron I attended, several of
us had a long talk about this. MI doesn't cover the full range of what a
user can do with GDB. An MI testsuite would be good, but we'd still need
all the current GDB tests.

	- rob -

_______________________________________________
DejaGnu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQQYk2vt9P4wiD5DJs5QuaEQoLbT/gUCXA/QNwAKCRBQuaEQoLbT
/jGcAKCMDhI28WA2jx2X2uKcApTZQUYkogCcC7j4GBh8ffrAymupbjmdkrczXZQ=
=lrhc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.