Re: AVR simulator support
Jacob Bachmeyer <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:11:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pip Cet wrote: > I'm running the GCC testsuite on AVR using the simulator included in > binutils-gdb, and an avr-sim.exp file, which essentially duplicates > all the other *-sim.exp files. > > Is that the right way, or should I be using generic-sim.exp or multi-sim.exp? > The multi-sim.exp file seems to be for testing multilib targets and the generic-sim.exp file seems to be for the Cygnus multi-target simulator. As far as I can tell right now, avr-sim.exp should be a separate board file. > If the right way is to use an avr-sim.exp file, what's the best way of > adding one to the DejaGNU distribution? Posting on the mailing list was the first step. :-) > I think the changes qualify as > "tiny", but obviously signing a copyright assignment is not a problem > if that's the preferred way. > Please contact <[email protected]> to get the forms. > The only complications are that the AVR simulator needs an extra > object file to be linked, an extra -mmcu=* flag to be provided during > compilation, and that a different libc is used. > > I'm attaching my avr-sim.exp for reference. > I see a few changes to make on a first glance: 1. Beginning with 1.6.3 (to be released soon) and in current Git, the "compiler" board_info key is optional and [find_gcc] is evaluated to obtain a default value. If avr-sim.exp needs avr-gcc, using [find_gcc] is probably wrong and it should select "avr-gcc" instead. 2. There is a comment about the simulator not having arguments or signals that should be directly before the "noargs" and "gdb,nosignals" lines; if this came from another file in DejaGnu, please tell me which file so I can fix it. 3. The avr-libc include and link flags should probably be overridable using environment variables, instead of hard-coded empty strings. -- Jacob