Re: Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu
Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gcc <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Aug 2025 12:18:55 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gcc.devel,gmane.comp.sysutils.dejagnu.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <[email protected]> writes: > On 28/08/2025 15:01, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>=20 >> =E2=80=A6 the classification is useful, but the false positive =E2=80=9C= new fail / old fail went away=E2=80=9D >> pairs are a real nuiscance .. hopefully we can have some brainstorming @= cauldron about >> ways to deal with this (e.g. fuzzy matching or some smart way to discard= the twinkling >> line numbers). >>=20 > > Well really, the compare-tests script should report duplicate results as = a problem as > well, since > > PASS: abcd > ... > PASS: abcd > > is just a dup pass/fail waiting to happen. GDB has some magic to detect and report duplicate test names during the DejaGNU run: https://sourceware.org/git?p=3Dbinutils-gdb.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dgdb/testsuite/= lib/check-test-names.exp;h=3D049addd49a93744a832ec0fb5249cd59f3db74f1;hb=3D= refs/heads/master#l64 --=20 Thiago