Re: [PATCH 3/3 ver. 2] Adjust H8 related settings to match modern binutils/gcc.

On 11/11/25 06:58, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Nov 11 2025, Jan Dubiec wrote:
>
>> @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ set_board_info gdb,noresults 1
>>   set_board_info gcc,stack_size 4096
>>   set_board_info gcc,text_size 60000
>>   
>> -# There's no long long support on this target
>> -set_board_info no_long_long  1
>> +# There is long long support on this target
>> +set_board_info no_long_long  0
> The gcc and gdb testsuites only check for the existence of the
> no_long_long setting, not its particular value.

I had suspected as much, but I am not familiar with the intricacies of 
the toolchain testsuites; this is why I asked about this.

Do I correctly understand that {set_board_info no_long_long X} should be 
omitted entirely for the GCC testsuite to exercise long long support?  
(Obviously, those tests will fail if GCC does not actually support long 
long on the target.)


-- Jacob