Re: Re-factoring the graphical fonts

Markus Dolze <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.lcdproc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Using BDF would be another option. Currently I planning to integrate the
serdisplib driver by Bernhard and make the FreeType support it contains
available as a shared lib for other drivers.

The reason that I have not put anything in 0-31 is simply a restriction
of the font creation tool I used.

Yes, full height hbars look bad on seamless displays. To use the
lib_hbar_static() with a smaller blocks I have to recompile everything
with SEAMLESS_HBARS to prevent it from using ICON_BLOCK_FILLED for the
full block. This is annoying me for a long time already and I think this
should be an option a driver may set. However, I have not yet found time
to change it.

Anyway, I updated the font a little:

    * Use hbar chars in line with character height.
    * Update small 'c'. The original looked strange compared to other
      fonts (although it was like on hd44780 displays)
    * Use heart without the surrounding box like in current t6963 and
      imonlcd fonts.

Regards,
Markus

On 22.03.2011 07:50, Eric Pooch wrote:
> The font looks good - like the standard HD44780 font, which will be
> nice for consistency.  As I mentioned it previously - a BDF font
> rendering library in LCDproc would be nice.  I would be happy to
> help.  Is there a reason why aren't you using the 0-31 characters in
> the top row of the font?   Also, I recall in my testing that a full
> height horizontally extending bar looked too tall, which is why we
> only included a shorter version.
>
> --Eric
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.