Re: on log standards
James Turnbull <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Anton Chuvakin wrote: > He-he, and how exactly do you pressure, say, IBM :-), into documenting > all the log messages? Some companies (like Cisco) are pretty good at > that while others are pretty abysmal. At the same time, there is no > way to document all Unix syslog messages (and Windows event log > messages) since everybody and their doc can write there ... > In addition to all the messages that no one knows the meaning of. Lot's of mystery messages, even in major products, introduced and not documented. Regards James Turnbull -- James Turnbull <[email protected]> --- Author of Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) --- PGP Key (http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x0C42DF40)