Re: Reviewing Vista/2k3 log files from the same platform

"Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
That's still not quite my point....and granted, perhaps I wasn't 
supposed to be able to do what I was doing...but nonetheless I did it. 
.... pre Vista for basic admin "what's nailing my server" I can/do look 
at the 2k3 security log file in a XP event viewer.   If Vista is my 
desktop of choice (and it's not ....quite yet...) while the events for 
"success" from a 2k3 box are readable, the "failures" are not.  That 
surprised me is all.

Because the event logs (which don't get me wrong I LOVE the new stuff) 
have the new XML values I was just surprised that my quick and dirty log 
view that shouldn't have worked before....but more often than not did... 
now really doesn't.




Eric Fitzgerald wrote:
> Hey Tina!
>
>   
>> For years one of my *favorite* parts of Microsoft logging is that
>> event IDs *have* remained consistent across versions of the operating
>> systems...
>> What's the plan for heterogeneous Windows
>>     
> environments?
>
>
> We almost always kept the same event ID's from version to version
> pre-Vista.  The problem was that the tools didn't do well correlating
> events or finding a subset of events with a similar characteristic so
> we'd either split an event ID into two, or combine two into one,
> depending on which problem was being complain^h^h^h emphasized more at
> the time.
>
> However we did a whole bunch of event cleanup in Vista and the resulting
> events were different enough from their pre-Vista equivalents to break
> automation.  So we had to renumber, to save you.  But I knew that folks
> like you on this list would want to leverage your pre-Vista knowledge
> instead of memorizing 300-odd new events.
>
> So here is my New Years' gift to all of you.
>
> For almost all security log events, EventId(Vista) = EventId(PreVista) +
> 4096
>
> You can do it in your head- add 4000, add 100, subtract 4.  528 -->
> 4624, etc.
>
> Best regards,
> Eric
>
>   

-- 
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?  
http://www.threatcode.com

If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.