Re: on database logging

"Anton Chuvakin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> All the current trend toward legislating compliance has
> accomplished is setting the bar very low, and encouraging
> companies to look only at meeting that standard. I've had
> senior IT managers tell me "We are going to do the exact
> minimum, wherever possible."

No kidding - but, at the same time, those organizations who used to
fly (eh, crawl) BELOW that low bar would benefit if they are kicked
into doing at least *something*. So, I am a bit more positive about
such compliance motivators.

> In log analysis terms, that means that the logs to to a big
> bucket which is periodically dumped into the compost
> heap.

Indeed, this is common but compare this to a) never enabling logging
or b) disabling logging or c) storing logs based on short default
retention policy on each device? A huge improvement, isn't it?

>Nobody'll look in the bucket until someone passes
> legislation requiring people to LOOK at it. And, of course,
> when that happens, they'll do the exact minimum, &c...

Well, this already happened: e.g. PCI. It doesn't define what
"looking" means, but running a log analysis tool sure beats just
running a tape drive to save the logs...

Best,
-- 
Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCIA, GCIH, GCFA
      http://www.chuvakin.org
  http://chuvakin.blogspot.com
    http://www.info-secure.org
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.