Re: SIM solution - Objectives ?
"saudi sans" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks. We have Windows , Unix hosts and Checkpoint Firewalls being monitored. Does anyone have list of items [ standalone or co-related ] which merit being monitored and alerted on these devices? What I think I need is , a qualified list of events-of-interest, on these platforms? Events which are not declared by the event-source vendor but those which from experience merits attention by us. On 5/24/07, Ron Gula <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Saudi, > > The real question is what constitutes a high alert for your network. > This is the biggest differentiator I've seen in deployments of our > logging products or other log/event managers out there. > > If a high alert is nothing more than calling you if a certain Snort > event occurs, that is pretty simplistic and I don't really see a need to > be called within 15 or 30 minutes since this should be automated. > > However, if your "high" alert is something more serious like a > successful compromise, a PCI/compliance usage violation or just that the > main firewall went down, I could see putting these into specific SLA > obligations being quite difficult to nail down. It could take more CPU > computation to arrive at a conclusion that a high quality alert occurred > within a specific policy, but most SIM/log-analyzers can do this sort of > thing today. > > Separating High and Medium events based on alert time seems really > artificial to me. If your MSP is using automation to get an alert, I > doubt the Medium alerts take longer to compute than the High alerts. > > (I haven't posted much here but Tenable does offer log aggregation, > normalization and correlation tools for netflow, syslog, firewalls, .etc) > > Ron Gula, CTO > Tenable Network Security > http://www.tenablesecurity.com > > > saudi sans wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have just started using a leading SIM for monitoring logs. It works > > well. > > > > The SIM management is outsourced. We have about 150 servers and 10 > > security devices. > > > > We have SLAs that if a High alert comes vendor should inform us within > > 15 minutes , for medium alert it is 30 minutes .....etc. > > > > Are corporates [who have some level of maturity in this space] using > > SIM solutions to do real time response or are we using it for weekly > > reports and then doing trend analysis ? > > > > Does it make sense to receive High alerts and take a 15 minute > > response when a login failure happens on a few servers.? > > > > This question is NOT related to the SIM product capabilities but > > process to be followed and what goals we should set to achieve with > > SIM > > _______________________________________________ > > LogAnalysis mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.loganalysis.org/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis > > > >