Re: Cross-Platform Log Analysis and Microsoft
Matt Cuttler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mordechai T. Abzug wrote: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:00:11AM -0400, David Corlette wrote: > > >> And latter-day attempts to send >> it over SSL or whatever are, to my mind, a band-aid solution. >> Agreed with both posters - that syslog, in general, can suck. (But..) Separate that from an organization who wishes to take *that same old syslog data*, and wrap the transport in a more "modern-day" alternative such as TCP transport, and crypt it with secure sockets. That's not putting "lipstick on a pig", or an attempt to glamorize the Band-Aid(tm) "solution" -- it's just optional add-ons. Often, the sysadmins are just following the Boss's (or the Auditor(s)) recommendations -- which are usually blanket statements such as "ALL audit traffic MUST be encrypted". > " while > some people call old stuff "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." > That's true, but you'll find that some of the world's brightest people usually don't work within that constraint :)