Re: syslog config file format poll
"Mordechai T. Abzug" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:30:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:13:16PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote: > Marcin Antkiewicz wrote: > >>I also like XML, because I work with XML-lovers who know how to parse > > Minor nit: use of XML is actually prima facie evidence that you DON'T > know how to parse. Heh. I vote against XML. Or at least for XML to not be the only way to config; you can always allow for multiple config mechanisms, and accept whichever is present, and/or merge multiple config methods if present. syslog-ng has a perfectly good config format. Might as well use something similar to that. So, what does rsyslog do that syslog-ng doesn't? - Morty