Re: UDP/TCP load balancer recommendations
"Mordechai T. Abzug" <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:30:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.sysutils.loganalysis |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:01:04PM -0500, Steve Bernacki wrote: > My organization is about to embark on a project to fortify our log > capture and analysis infrastructure. One item that I've identified > as being necessary is a load balancer to spread the incoming message > stream (primarily syslog/udp) across our back-end syslog-ng > receivers. Are you really looking to load balance, or are you looking for redundancy/failover? If you are really looking for load balancing, you will need a good solution for event correlation across systems, or you will need to insert your events into some kind of shared DB or shared FS. If you are looking for redundancy/failover, you might be better off having your sources each send to multiple syslog server, with each server on a different subnet. If your network supports proper routed multicast and your hosts are using UDP syslog, you can save some bandwidth by multicasting syslog -- although expect to have many issues getting that working quite right. - Morty